John Marshall Quotes About Constitution

• Un poder ilimitado para gravar implica, necesariamente, un poder para destruir; porque hay un límite más allá del cual ninguna institución y ninguna propiedad pueden soportar impuestos.

  John Marshall

  Derecho, Fiscalidad, Límites

• Un acto legislativo contrario a la Constitución no es ley.

  John Marshall

  Gobierno, Derecho, Constitución

  John Marshall (2005). "The Political and Economic Doctrines of John Marshall" (Las doctrinas políticas y económicas de John Marshall), p. 337, The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. (Reino Unido).

• El pueblo hizo la Constitución y el pueblo puede deshacerla. Es la criatura de su propia voluntad, y sólo vive por su voluntad.

  John Marshall

  Pueblo, Democracia, Constitución de Estados Unidos

  John Marshall, Joseph Potter Cotton (2000). "The Constitutional Decisions of John Marshall" (Las decisiones constitucionales de John Marshall), p. 417, The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. (Reino Unido).

• La fraseología particular de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos confirma y refuerza el principio, que se supone esencial para todas las constituciones escritas, de que una ley que repugne a la Constitución es nula; y que los tribunales, así como otros departamentos, están obligados por ese instrumento.

  John Marshall

  Ley, Nulo, Principios

  John Marshall (2005). "The Political and Economic Doctrines of John Marshall", p.340, The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., Londres, 2005.

• Las circunstancias peculiares del momento pueden hacer que una medida sea más o menos acertada, pero no pueden hacerla más o menos constitucional.

  John Marshall

  Sabio, Peculiar, Mayo

  John Marshall (1974). "Los papeles de John Marshall: Correspondence, papers, and selected judicial opinions, March 1814-December 1819", The University of North Carolina Press

• Una constitución está concebida para las edades venideras y está diseñada para acercarse a la inmortalidad tanto como las instituciones humanas pueden acercarse a ella.

  John Marshall

  Edad, Constitución, Enmarcado

  John Marshall, Joseph Potter Cotton (2000). "The Constitutional Decisions of John Marshall" (Las decisiones constitucionales de John Marshall), p. 415, The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. (Reino Unido).

• Whether a law be void for its repugnancy to the Constitution, is, at all times, a question of much delicacy, which out seldom, if ever, to be decided in the affirmative, in doubtful case. ... But it is not on slight implication and vague conjecture that the legislature is to be pronounced to have transcended its powers, and its acts to be considered as void. The opposition between the Constitution and the law should be such that the judge feels a clear and strong conviction of their incompatibility with each other.

  John Marshall

  Strong, Law, Judging

  Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 87, 128, 1810.

• La constitución es una ley suprema superior, inmutable por medios ordinarios, o está al nivel de los actos legislativos ordinarios, alterable cuando la legislatura quiera modificarla. Es enfáticamente competencia y deber del departamento judicial decir cuál es la ley. Esta es la esencia misma del deber judicial.

  John Marshall

  Significado, Ley, Esencia

  Marbury contra Madison (1803)

• That the people have an original right to establish, for their future government, such principles as, in their opinion, shall most conduce to their own happiness, is the basis, on which the whole American fabric has been erected.... The principles, therefore, so established, are deemed fundamental. And as the authority, from which they proceed, is supreme ... they are designed to be permanent.... The powers of the legislature are defined, and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken, or forgotten, the constitution is written.

  John Marshall

  Government, People, Fabric

• Certainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void.

  John Marshall

  Government, Law, Void

  Marbury contra Madison (1803)

• Let the end be legitimate, let it be within the scope of the constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to that end, which are not prohibited, but consist with the letter and spirit of the constitution, are constitutional.

  John Marshall

  Mean, Letters, Spirit

  McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

También te puede gustar:

John Adams

James Madison

Andrew Jackson

Thomas Jefferson

Aaron Burr

John Quincy Adams

Henry Clay